Blog

Is Social Security Insolvent?

Social Security, a cornerstone of the American social safety net, provides critical financial support to retirees. Established in 1935 under the Social Security Act, the program has been a lifeline for millions. However, concerns about its long-term financial sustainability have sparked debates over whether Social Security is insolvent.

To determine whether Social Security is insolvent, let’s first define insolvency in this context. Insolvency typically means an inability to meet financial obligations as they come due. For Social Security, this would mean failing to pay scheduled benefits to beneficiaries. According to the 2024 Social Security Administration (SSA) Trustees Report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which funds retirement and survivor benefits, is projected to be depleted by 2035 under current assumptions. If depletion occurs, absent legislative action, benefits would need to be cut by approximately 21% to align with incoming revenue. This projection fuels claims of insolvency, but it does not mean the program is currently unable to pay benefits or that it will collapse entirely.

Factors Contributing to Challenges

Several factors contribute to Social Security’s financial challenges. First, demographic shifts are straining the system. Americans are living longer, birth rates are declining, and the ratio of workers paying into Social Security versus retirees drawing benefits is shrinking. In 1960, there were about five workers per retiree; today, that ratio is roughly 2.8, and by 2035, it is expected to drop to 2.3. Fewer contributors relative to beneficiaries reduce the program’s revenue base. Second, rising income inequality has eroded Social Security’s funding. The payroll tax cap, set at $168,600 in 2024, means earnings above this threshold are not taxed for Social Security. As a growing share of income accrues to high earners, less total income is subject to the tax. Third, inflation adjustments and increasing life expectancy raise benefit costs over time, outpacing revenue growth.

Despite these challenges, calling Social Security insolvent oversimplifies the issue. The program is primarily funded through payroll taxes, which provide a steady revenue stream. In 2023, Social Security paid out $1.4 trillion in benefits to 71 million beneficiaries, with 90% of its revenue coming from payroll taxes, 7% from interest on the trust fund, and 3% from taxing benefits. Even if the trust fund is depleted, ongoing payroll tax revenue would cover about 79% of scheduled benefits. Thus, Social Security is not bankrupt in the traditional sense—it will continue to collect revenue and pay benefits, albeit at a reduced level without reforms.

Critics arguing insolvency often point to the trust fund’s projected depletion as evidence of systemic failure. They contend that the government’s practice of borrowing from the trust fund to finance other spending has “raided” Social Security, rendering it unsustainable. However, this view misrepresents the mechanics. The trust fund invests surplus revenue in U.S. Treasury securities, which are among the safest assets globally. These securities earn interest, and the government is obligated to repay them. The real issue is not mismanagement but the growing gap between revenue and obligations driven by demographics and economic trends.

On the other hand, defenders of Social Security argue that the program’s challenges are manageable with targeted reforms. Several policy options could close the funding gap. Raising the payroll tax cap to cover a larger share of high earners’ income could boost revenue significantly. For example, eliminating the cap entirely could cover roughly 70% of the projected shortfall, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Increasing the payroll tax rate, currently 12.4% (split between employers and employees), by 1-2 percentage points is another option, though it faces resistance from those concerned about tax burdens. Adjusting benefits, such as reducing payments for high-income retirees or tweaking the cost-of-living adjustment formula, could also help. More ambitious proposals include expanding Social Security by increasing benefits and funding them through new revenue sources, like a wealth tax, though these face political hurdles.

Political Challenges

The political landscape complicates reform efforts. Social Security enjoys broad public support, with 80% of Americans in a 2023 Pew Research poll opposing benefit cuts. Yet, partisan divides over solutions—tax increases versus benefit reductions—have stalled progress. Delaying action worsens the problem, as earlier reforms allow for gradual adjustments, while waiting until 2035 would necessitate sharper cuts or tax hikes.

In conclusion, Social Security is not currently insolvent, as it continues to pay full benefits and will have revenue to cover most benefits even after trust fund depletion. However, its long-term financial imbalance is undeniable, driven by demographic and economic shifts which will require difficult political decisions to be made in the near future.